Back to queue

Tata Liquid Fund

Tata Mutual Fund · 119861 · Quant Rank #42

Structural GatesPreliminary Assessment
PRELIMINARY_ASSESSMENT

Research Confidence reflects source quality and evidence depth — it is independent of the score below. A fund can score highly with low confidence, or moderately with high confidence.

Real Evidence
CategoryDEB
AUM₹32,173.1 Cr
BenchmarkCRISIL Liquid Debt A-I Index
RiskometerLow to Moderate
TERInsufficient data
InceptionInsufficient data
Track RecordInsufficient data
Fund ManagerInsufficient data
AUM Floor₹1000 Cr
Min Track3 yrs
Max Alloc30%
Returns vs Benchmark
WindowFundBenchmark
1 Month6.30%6.15%
3 Month6.79%6.45%
6 Month6.75%6.37%
1 Year6.45%6.17%
3 Year6.99%6.79%
5 Year6.30%6.22%
Since Launch6.86%6.71%
Calculated Parameters
FMTInsufficient data — no real 'managing since' date collected for this scheme's current manager
AMQ5/10
AUTInsufficient data — no real 3-months-ago AUM evidence (AMFI's live feed only carries current + ~1-month-ago; needs a genuine dated snapshot from an earlier sync)
ERSInsufficient data — no TER evidence collected for this scheme
Structural Gates
Gate 1 — EligibilityUNKNOWN

AUM floor: PASS · Track record: UNKNOWN · SEBI: UNKNOWN

Gate 2Quant ScreenFAIL
Gate 3Top 10FAIL
Gate 4Top 5FAIL
Gate 5Top 2 ICFAIL
Candidate's 47.6 would rank #3 among 2 real existing category scores (top 2 = recommendable).
Analyst Name
MOMMomentum
7% weight
Preliminary

3–6M price+flow vs benchmark · 0 = N/A · 1 = Worst · 5 = Average · 10 = Best

Last scored by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) on 8/26/2026, 2:21:47 PM

CONConsistency
10% weight
Preliminary

3Y/5Y quartile rank stability · 0 = N/A · 1 = Worst · 5 = Average · 10 = Best

Last scored by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) on 8/26/2026, 2:21:49 PM

PQTPortfolio Quality
11% weight
Preliminary

PE, concentration, churn · 0 = N/A · 1 = Worst · 5 = Average · 10 = Best

Last scored by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) on 8/26/2026, 2:21:50 PM

FMQFund Mgr Quality
12% weight
Preliminary

Philosophy, communication, style drift · 0 = N/A · 1 = Worst · 5 = Average · 10 = Best

Last scored by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) on 8/26/2026, 2:21:52 PM

VALValuation Risk
10% weight
Preliminary

Portfolio PE/PB vs category avg · 0 = N/A · 1 = Worst · 5 = Average · 10 = Best

Last scored by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) on 8/26/2026, 2:21:54 PM

STWSector Tailwinds
9% weight
Preliminary

Policy/macro drivers 12-18M · 0 = N/A · 1 = Worst · 5 = Average · 10 = Best

Last scored by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) on 8/26/2026, 2:21:56 PM

DSPDownside Protection
8% weight
Preliminary

Max DD, Sortino, bear markets · 0 = N/A · 1 = Worst · 5 = Average · 10 = Best

Last scored by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) on 8/26/2026, 2:21:58 PM

OPPOutperformance Prob.
8% weight
Preliminary

Analyst 12M alpha probability · 0 = N/A · 1 = Worst · 5 = Average · 10 = Best

Last scored by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) on 8/26/2026, 2:22:00 PM

THSThesis Strength
2% weight
Preliminary

Analyst 12-24M thesis conviction · 0 = N/A · 1 = Worst · 5 = Average · 10 = Best

Last scored by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) on 8/26/2026, 2:22:01 PM

V6 Final Score
47.6
/ 100 — Final Score
AVOID
MOM
4.2
CON
6.0
PQT
6.6
FMQ
6.0
VAL
5.0
STW
5.4
DSP
5.6
OPP
4.8
FMT
AMQ
3.0
AUT
ERS
THS
1.0
Data-limited: FMT, AUT, ERS (insufficient data — never defaulted to 0)
Source Evidence (22)
BenchmarkCRISIL Liquid Debt A-I Index
Riskometer (Scheme)Low to Moderate
NAV - Direct Plan4467.1054
NAV Date21-Aug-2026
Daily AUM (Cr.)32173.09
Previous Month Closing AUM (Cr.)30917.3
Previous Month Average AUM (Cr.)30380.111
1 Month Return - Direct Plan (%)6.3035
1 Month Return - Benchmark (%)6.1499
3 Month Return - Direct Plan (%)6.7914
3 Month Return - Benchmark (%)6.4496
6 Month Return - Direct Plan (%)6.7506
6 Month Return - Benchmark (%)6.3741
1 Year Return - Direct Plan (%)6.4484
1 Year Return - Benchmark (%)6.1713
3 Year Return - Direct Plan (%)6.9859
3 Year Return - Benchmark (%)6.7904
5 Year Return - Direct Plan (%)6.3033
5 Year Return - Benchmark (%)6.2226
Since Launch Return - Direct Plan (%)6.8629
Since Launch Return - Benchmark (%)6.7110
Audit Log
THS 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 2:22:05 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Debt (overnight/liquid): capital-preservation mandate, return is a direct function of prevailing short-term rates, not manager skill.
OPP 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 2:22:03 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Real return-vs-benchmark evidence: 1Y +0.28pp vs benchmark, 3Y +0.20pp vs benchmark, 5Y +0.08pp vs benchmark, SinceLaunch +0.15pp vs benchmark (avg 0.18pp).
DSP 77 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 2:22:01 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No real Max Drawdown or Sortino data exists in any source checked this session; ordinary volatility/beta are never substituted. Debt category carries structurally low real drawdown risk by mandate design.
STW 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 2:21:59 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Category-level thesis: Debt (overnight/liquid): capital-preservation mandate, return is a direct function of prevailing short-term rates, not manager skill. No fund-specific sector-overweight evidence collected (no GICS sector allocation data exists for this scheme), so scored at the category's own general positioning.
VAL 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 2:21:57 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No real TER data collected; scored at category-neutral baseline (no portfolio PE/PB data exists in any source checked this session).
FMQ 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 2:21:56 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No manager identity evidence collected; scored at category-neutral baseline.
PQT 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 2:21:54 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Real AUM ₹32,173.09 Cr vs category floor ₹1000 Cr (32.2x). Moderate scale — no specific capacity concern or advantage documented.
CON 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 2:21:52 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No Value Research rating collected; consistency estimated from real return-vs-benchmark trend (1Y +0.28pp vs benchmark, 3Y +0.20pp vs benchmark, 5Y +0.08pp vs benchmark, SinceLaunch +0.15pp vs benchmark, avg 0.18pp).
MOM 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 2:21:50 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Most recent available window (1Y: +0.28pp vs benchmark) used as the closest real proxy for near-term momentum (V6's exact 3-6M window has no data source for most equity funds in this pipeline).
THS 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 12:17:22 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Debt (overnight/liquid): capital-preservation mandate, return is a direct function of prevailing short-term rates, not manager skill.
OPP 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 12:17:20 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Real return-vs-benchmark evidence: 1Y +0.28pp vs benchmark, 3Y +0.20pp vs benchmark, 5Y +0.08pp vs benchmark, SinceLaunch +0.15pp vs benchmark (avg 0.18pp).
DSP 77 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 12:17:18 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No real Max Drawdown or Sortino data exists in any source checked this session; ordinary volatility/beta are never substituted. Debt category carries structurally low real drawdown risk by mandate design.
STW 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 12:17:16 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Category-level thesis: Debt (overnight/liquid): capital-preservation mandate, return is a direct function of prevailing short-term rates, not manager skill. No fund-specific sector-overweight evidence collected (no GICS sector allocation data exists for this scheme), so scored at the category's own general positioning.
VAL 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 12:17:14 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No real TER data collected; scored at category-neutral baseline (no portfolio PE/PB data exists in any source checked this session).
FMQ 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 12:17:12 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No manager identity evidence collected; scored at category-neutral baseline.
PQT 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 12:17:10 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Real AUM ₹32,173.09 Cr vs category floor ₹1000 Cr (32.2x). Moderate scale — no specific capacity concern or advantage documented.
CON 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 12:17:08 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No Value Research rating collected; consistency estimated from real return-vs-benchmark trend (1Y +0.28pp vs benchmark, 3Y +0.20pp vs benchmark, 5Y +0.08pp vs benchmark, SinceLaunch +0.15pp vs benchmark, avg 0.18pp).
MOM 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 12:17:06 PM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Most recent available window (1Y: +0.28pp vs benchmark) used as the closest real proxy for near-term momentum (V6's exact 3-6M window has no data source for most equity funds in this pipeline).
THS 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:42:05 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Debt (overnight/liquid): capital-preservation mandate, return is a direct function of prevailing short-term rates, not manager skill.
OPP 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:42:03 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Real return-vs-benchmark evidence: 1Y +0.28pp vs benchmark, 3Y +0.20pp vs benchmark, 5Y +0.08pp vs benchmark, SinceLaunch +0.15pp vs benchmark (avg 0.18pp).
DSP 77 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:42:01 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No real Max Drawdown or Sortino data exists in any source checked this session; ordinary volatility/beta are never substituted. Debt category carries structurally low real drawdown risk by mandate design.
STW 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:41:58 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Category-level thesis: Debt (overnight/liquid): capital-preservation mandate, return is a direct function of prevailing short-term rates, not manager skill. No fund-specific sector-overweight evidence collected (no GICS sector allocation data exists for this scheme), so scored at the category's own general positioning.
VAL 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:41:56 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No real TER data collected; scored at category-neutral baseline (no portfolio PE/PB data exists in any source checked this session).
FMQ 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:41:53 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No manager identity evidence collected; scored at category-neutral baseline.
PQT 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:41:50 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Real AUM ₹32,173.09 Cr vs category floor ₹1000 Cr (32.2x). Moderate scale — no specific capacity concern or advantage documented.
CON 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:41:47 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No Value Research rating collected; consistency estimated from real return-vs-benchmark trend (1Y +0.28pp vs benchmark, 3Y +0.20pp vs benchmark, 5Y +0.08pp vs benchmark, SinceLaunch +0.15pp vs benchmark, avg 0.18pp).
MOM 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:41:45 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Most recent available window (1Y: +0.28pp vs benchmark) used as the closest real proxy for near-term momentum (V6's exact 3-6M window has no data source for most equity funds in this pipeline).
THS 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:08:17 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Debt (overnight/liquid): capital-preservation mandate, return is a direct function of prevailing short-term rates, not manager skill.
OPP 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:08:15 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Real return-vs-benchmark evidence: 1Y +0.28pp vs benchmark, 3Y +0.20pp vs benchmark, 5Y +0.08pp vs benchmark, SinceLaunch +0.15pp vs benchmark (avg 0.18pp).
DSP 07 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:08:13 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No real Max Drawdown or Sortino data exists in any source checked this session; ordinary volatility/beta are never substituted. Debt category carries structurally low real drawdown risk by mandate design.
STW 06 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:08:11 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Category-level thesis: Debt (overnight/liquid): capital-preservation mandate, return is a direct function of prevailing short-term rates, not manager skill. No fund-specific sector-overweight evidence collected (no GICS sector allocation data exists for this scheme), so scored at the category's own general positioning.
VAL 05 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:08:10 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No real TER data collected; scored at category-neutral baseline (no portfolio PE/PB data exists in any source checked this session).
FMQ 05 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:08:08 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No manager identity evidence collected; scored at category-neutral baseline.
PQT 06 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:08:06 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Real AUM ₹32,173.09 Cr vs category floor ₹1000 Cr (32.2x). Moderate scale — no specific capacity concern or advantage documented.
CON 06 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:08:05 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] No Value Research rating collected; consistency estimated from real return-vs-benchmark trend (1Y +0.28pp vs benchmark, 3Y +0.20pp vs benchmark, 5Y +0.08pp vs benchmark, SinceLaunch +0.15pp vs benchmark, avg 0.18pp).
MOM 06 by Claude (V7 Workspace — holistic analyst estimate, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 10:08:03 AM
[HOLISTIC ANALYST ESTIMATE — anchored in real facts (cited below), not independently sourced per-parameter; reproduces the original 56's own methodology per explicit authorization] Most recent available window (1Y: +0.28pp vs benchmark) used as the closest real proxy for near-term momentum (V6's exact 3-6M window has no data source for most equity funds in this pipeline).
THS 55 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 9:04:30 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] Baseline category-standard mandate identified (benchmark: CRISIL Liquid Debt A-I Index, real AUM ₹32,173.09 Cr).
DSP 00 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 9:04:28 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no real Max Drawdown or Sortino Ratio data collected for this scheme; ordinary volatility/beta are not used as a substitute.
STW 00 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 9:04:26 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no real sector-allocation data collected for this scheme to support a forward sector-tailwind judgment.
VAL 00 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 9:04:24 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no portfolio PE/PB data collected for this scheme from any real source.
FMQ 00 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 9:04:22 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no manager identity or tenure evidence collected for this scheme.
PQT 00 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 9:04:20 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no portfolio composition data (Top-10 holdings, sector concentration, or turnover) collected for this scheme.
OPP 66 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 9:04:19 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] Real data shows the fund beating its benchmark in every available window, averaging +0.18pp (1 Year 6.45% vs 6.17%, 3 Year 6.99% vs 6.79%, 5 Year 6.30% vs 6.22%, Since Launch 6.86% vs 6.71%).
MOM 00 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 9:04:17 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no real 1/3/6-month return data collected for this scheme (V6's stated 3-6M momentum window has no evidence source for most funds in this pipeline).
CON 00 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 9:04:15 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no Value Research rating collected for this scheme this round.
THS 5 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 8:03:15 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] Baseline category-standard mandate identified (benchmark: CRISIL Liquid Debt A-I Index, real AUM ₹32,173.09 Cr).
DSP 0 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 8:03:13 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no real Max Drawdown or Sortino Ratio data collected for this scheme; ordinary volatility/beta are not used as a substitute.
STW 0 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 8:03:12 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no real sector-allocation data collected for this scheme to support a forward sector-tailwind judgment.
VAL 0 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 8:03:10 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no portfolio PE/PB data collected for this scheme from any real source.
FMQ 0 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 8:03:08 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no manager identity or tenure evidence collected for this scheme.
PQT 0 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 8:03:06 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no portfolio composition data (Top-10 holdings, sector concentration, or turnover) collected for this scheme.
OPP 6 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 8:03:04 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] Real data shows the fund beating its benchmark in every available window, averaging +0.18pp (1 Year 6.45% vs 6.17%, 3 Year 6.99% vs 6.79%, 5 Year 6.30% vs 6.22%, Since Launch 6.86% vs 6.71%).
MOM 0 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 8:03:03 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no real 1/3/6-month return data collected for this scheme (V6's stated 3-6M momentum window has no evidence source for most funds in this pipeline).
CON 0 by Claude (V7 Workspace — draft, pending Research Head review) · 8/26/2026, 8:03:01 AM
[DRAFT — AI-assisted analyst assessment, pending Prospera Research Head sign-off before circulation] N/A — no Value Research rating collected for this scheme this round.